International Socialism

Are Voters Too Stupid to Save Themselves?

Are Voters Too Stupid to Save Themselves?

America will be hearing quite a bit less from me regarding the imperative of defeating Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton than they heard in 2008 regarding the imperative of defeating Barack Hussein Obama. There are two chief reasons for this: One is that in light of my having broken the story nationally pertaining to Obama’s ties to radical preacher Rev. Jeremiah Wright and the racialist doctrine of his church in Chicago on February 28, 2007, some in the press were quite interested in what I had to say at the time. Since there’s no analogue for this relative to the current election cycle, there’s been less to capitalize on vis-à-vis media exposure.

The second reason has to do with the comparative track records of Obama and Clinton at the outset of their campaigns, and the questionable wisdom of appealing to an electorate that may have already reached the point of no return in its ignorance and delusion.

While a few people such as myself and Sean Hannity were shouting from the rooftops in 2008 about how Obama had telegraphed his evil intentions via many questionable associations, his books, and his rhetoric, he had no track record to speak of in 2008. As a result, many voters simply gave him the benefit of the doubt. To some extent, this is understandable.

It has probably become painfully obvious that Clinton is enjoying the same benefit (as did Obama in 2008) of an establishment press that is wholly invested in advancing the international socialist agenda. Recent displays of sycophantism on the part of presidential debate moderators should handily lay to rest any arguments against this conclusion.

Granted that there was more fanfare on the part of the press surrounding Obama’s ascendancy, his being America’s heralded First Black President and all, whereas there is more damage control going on pertaining to Clinton’s campaign. The objective is the same, however: Get an otherwise unelectable, virulently radical leftist elected to the office of President of the United States.

As an aside: For those who may be wondering why I employ the phrase “international socialist” as opposed to the more widely-used “global socialist,” this is because the methods and nature of global elites are proving to be identical to those of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (or Nazi Party) which came to power in Germany during just prior to World War II. So, it’s truly ironic that prominent liberals have taken to characterizing Hillary Clinton’s Republican opponent and his surrogates as Nazis.

Unlike candidate Obama in 2008 however, Hillary Clinton has already forged a legacy of deceit, predatory opportunism, and unbridled greed. Long before Ms. Clinton violated the Espionage Act in her influence peddling, lost $6 billion in State Department funds, bleached illegal email servers, or practically ordered the executions of those who perished at Benghazi, it was common knowledge to millions of Americans that she and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, had lied, cheated, stolen and perhaps even killed their way to fortune and glory. Recent email server scandal revelations are underscoring the fact that her actions as Secretary of State rivaled those of America’s most corrupt political operatives and organized crime figures.

Hence the need for damage control. Voters – even those who are planning to vote for GOP nominee Donald Trump in a few weeks – may not be aware of the depth of evil and extent of the danger that Hillary Clinton represents, or the scope of complicity on the part of most lawmakers in our government, or the fallacy of the two-party system, but they’ve known Hillary Clinton to be crooked for decades.

The 2008 subprime mortgage debacle, the home foreclosure epidemic, the 94 million Americans out of work, the millions of new Medicaid recipients, the explosion in the homeless population, the rising cost of living, the increase in terrorist attacks on our soil, moral ambivalence, trade imbalances, and ongoing cultural Balkanization – all of this has been the work of such as Clinton, Obama, and their stealth co-conspirators in the GOP. Neither the Constitution, capitalism, colonialism, the Judeo-Christian ethos, nor traditional values gave rise to these things; it has all been due to the influence of progressive-socialist policies.

Considering the foregoing, the idea that there is a very substantial contingent of the American electorate still willing to elect Clinton is sobering at best, and horrifying at worst. When we look at Hillary Clinton at rallies or debates, leering into the cameras with bug eyes and Jack Nicholson’s frozen Joker smirk, I believe we are looking into the face of sheer madness.

That aside, Clinton’s lack of comeliness is probably the least of her liabilities. Despite all the efforts of the press, at this point the empirical evidence should speak for itself. If it does not – and, barring widespread election fraud, we will know the answer in November – then it will be apparent that Americans’ capacity for self-delusion has overcome their basic instinct for self-preservation.

And that is a horrifying prospect indeed.

Originally published in WorldNetDaily

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
The Global Socialist-Islamist Axis in America

The Global Socialist-Islamist Axis in America

It was a busy weekend for miscreant Islamist scum operating under the imprimatur of the international socialist-Islamist axis within America. On Saturday, Ahmad Khan Rahami, a New Jersey resident and naturalized refugee from Afghanistan, detonated multiple bombs in New York and New Jersey. No one was killed, but nearly 30 people were injured. Rahami was apprehended three days later in Linden, New Jersey after a gun battle with police.

Also on Saturday, 22-year-old Dahir Adan, a Somali Muslim who had been living in the United States for the past 15 years, stabbed 9 people at a mall in St. Cloud, Minnesota. According to St. Cloud Police Chief William Blair Anderson, Adan –who was disguised as a security guard at the time of the attacks – “reportedly made references to Allah during the attack and asked at least one person whether they were Muslim.” Dahir was killed by police at the scene.

According to the New York Times, Rahami, the man arrested for the New York and New Jersey bombings, became a “completely different person” after a trip to Afghanistan, when it is presumed he became “radicalized,” a term used by the press and politicos to describe a Muslim who crosses that obscure line from Islamic to militant Islamist. It has also been reported that Rahami made several other trips to Pakistan and Afghanistan without being detected by the U.S. government. Rahami’s father, Mohammed Rahami, told the press this week that he had reported his son to the FBI as a potential terrorist in 2014, but the agency took no action.

While the Rahami and Adan stories have received wide press coverage, of course we are still being subjected to the usual spin and politically correct propaganda from the press and politicians which deftly avoids the motive attendant to these attacks – this being that the perpetrators were Muslims and were acting based on Islamic doctrine.

At this point, we’ve now seen several high-profile acts of domestic terrorism perpetrated by Muslims wherein communities and law enforcement agencies were previously made aware of the danger posed by these individuals. In all of these cases, nothing was done to mitigate the potential danger.

In the case of federal law enforcement, to some extent it stands to reason that organizations such as the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security might be less motivated to counter these threats, since these are under the control of the Obama administration, whose agenda includes destabilizing America through an influx of potentially violent Muslims and the establishment of insular Muslim communities. In a speech to the United Nations this week, our bath house refugee-playing statesman president Barack Hussein Obama defended increasing globalization and condemned the populist nationalism that has been growing in the West in direct response to the actions of murderous Muslim émigrés and refugees.

This deportment, which has included the Obama administration illegally facilitating the importation of tens of thousands of Muslims from unstable, culturally-bankrupt Islamic nations, has also given rise to such debacles as the 858 people who, according to a new Department of Homeland Security Inspector General’s report, were “mistakenly” granted citizenship due to a failure of the federal government’s fingerprint records system despite having been ordered deported. This is eerily reminiscent of the jihadi training camps known to exist across the continental U.S., but which law enforcement is prohibited from engaging because the Islamist groups operating them somewhat conveniently did not make it onto the federal government’s official list of terrorist organizations.

Tragically, this international socialist-Islamist axis of Western elites even includes powerful religious leaders such as Pope Francis, who regularly condemns “hateful acts of terrorism” with one breath while admonishing Europeans to “welcome refugees into your homes and communities” (the same refugees who are rioting and raping their way across that continent) with the next.

With regard to the United States, this is a component of the agenda calculated to render America irrelevant as a nation of influence on the world stage. The Islamists seek global supremacy for their foul doctrine, while the socialists harbor attitudes varying from those which hold that the concept of nations itself is outmoded, to those which characterize the U.S. as last among the old-school imperialist oppressor nations which must be dismantled. A chief stratagem of the latter is of course the idea that racism practiced by those of northern European descent has been the greatest evil of the last thousand years.

It’s a pretty safe bet that the conservative establishment press will have no interest in that upon which your humble commentator has to say regarding these matters from this point forward, since I would start with a moratorium on Muslim immigration and the summary expulsion of each and every Muslim foreign national in the United States. I would also revoke the citizenship of each and every naturalized Muslim citizen and deport them to their native countries, save for giving them the opportunity to renounce Islam in order to escape this fate. These people, as well as the second and third-generation descendants of Muslim émigrés, could count on ongoing surveillance to ensure their sincerity.

Here, obviously I am dispensing with the subverted notions of constitutionality popularly advanced by the left, as well as political correctness and cultural relativism. Islam is not a religion, nor should it be considered such under law; it is a retrograde system ascribed to by barbarians whose company I would typically pass on in favor of an afternoon cavorting with a troupe of lower primates.

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
Democrats’ Legacy of Hatred and Death

Democrats’ Legacy of Hatred and Death

Appearing on Fox News on Monday, Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke excoriated speakers at the Democratic National Convention, contending that the party is “embracing criminality.” While it is certainly gratifying to hear a champion of law and order (Clarke even asserted that Hillary Clinton is a “confirmed liar” who left people to die in Benghazi and who should have been criminally indicted) speak the truth, it is even more gratifying to see the play that other anti-Hillary media is getting, and the distaste members of her own party have evidenced for the first woman nominated to run for President.

“Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” the 2015 New York Times bestselling book by Peter Schweizer and subsequent documentary film of the same name, as well as “Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party,” the documentary by filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza are evidently being read and seen by many outside the sphere of conservative news junkies. Hillary Clinton has been heckled, booed, protested, and recommended for incarceration by other Democrats; even the Turner Broadcasting System (TBS) cable network recently had to issue an apology for comparing Ms. Clinton to a laughing hyena.

There’s little doubt that some of this has to do with the recent revelation by Wikileaks of the Democratic National Committee’s sabotage of candidate Bernie Sanders in his bid for the Democratic nomination, but inasmuch as it has become clear to many Republican voters that their party’s leadership is abetting hard-line socialists among Beltway Democrats, it appears to have become clear to many Democrats that the antics of those Democrats are destroying our nation.
Which brings us back to the criminality cited by Sheriff Clarke. While Hillary Clinton may epitomize the nefarious behavior that the Democratic Party has come to embody – lying, cheating, stealing, and occasionally even killing – she is by no means the only one who can be held up as guilty.

Last Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) – who by virtue of being a Muslim, ought not have been permitted to run for any public office – said Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump was “the worst Republican nominee since George Wallace.” Wallace, actually a Southern Democrat, sought that party’s nomination for President in 1964, 1972, and 1976. Though Ellison was corrected by Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) who was also on the show, this was no error on Ellison’s part; it was just one of the countless millions of lies proffered by Democrats to characterize Republicans as racist.

Earlier this week, Democratic member of the House Armed Services Committee Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA) compared Jewish Israeli settlers to termites while speaking at an event sponsored by an anti-Israel organization. While this is certainly in keeping with the Islamist Obama administration’s deportment toward Israel, it evidences the racism which Democrats habitually attempt to project onto their Republican and conservative counterparts. It is also noteworthy if highly ironic that Rep. Johnson, who voiced fears several years ago that the island of Guam might tip over and capsize if too many people came to reside there, happens to be black.

The Congressional Black Caucus has repeatedly and shamelessly celebrated the murderous Castro regime in Cuba, and even black Democrats such as Barack Hussein Obama lionized the late Sen. Robert Byrd, once a high-ranking member of the Ku Klux Klan.

I could go on ad infinitum…

While at this point the Democrats’ more outrageous lies, hypocrisy, and racism will only be embraced by certified mouth-breathing troglodytes, unfortunately there exists a substantial number of these shambling, braying creatures in any population, our electorate included.

“’Hillary’s America’ covers key historical events whitewashed from the revisionist American history taught in schools. Moviegoers witness the brutal displacement of the Seminoles by then General Andrew Jackson, the viewing of virulently racist Birth of a Nation in the Wilson White House, the direct connection between the Ku Klux Klan and the Democratic Party, the Republican Party as the party of the abolitionists, the connection of eugenicist Margaret Sanger and the Nazis and Planned Parenthood, and Lyndon Baines Johnson’s intrinsic racism.”

As detailed in “Hillary’s America” (and as most readers of this column already know), the Democrat party stood for slavery and segregation, both of which resulted in the deaths of untold numbers of blacks. The party currently stands for unfettered abortion, which has led to tens of millions of deaths, an inordinate number of them among blacks. Under the pretext of public safety, the party supports firearms laws that put innumerable Americans at the mercy of the criminal element. Finally, the Democratic Party supports policies which have led to the deaths of American service personnel through politically-correct rules of engagement, and American citizens as millions of illegal immigrants and now militant Muslims have been deposited within our borders as though our nation was a soon-to-be decommissioned latrine.

Why has the Democratic Party cultivated this legacy of death and historically attracted racists, eugenicists, genocidal maniacs, and warmongers? I have no answer to that question, but I do know this: The Democratic Party has now been entirely co-opted by those dedicated to completely dismantling both our system of government and the rule of law. With regard to the First Amendment protections behind which these swine have cowered for so long, I defer to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s defense of his call for moratoria on Muslim immigration; this being that the Constitution does not grant America “the right to commit suicide.”

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
Netflix Series Foreshadows Hillary’s Ruthlessness

Netflix Series Foreshadows Hillary’s Ruthlessness

Well, it appears to be the week of superficiality. On Tuesday, FBI director James Comey announced at a press conference that he would not recommend an indictment against Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton relating to her private email server scandal. According to Comey, Clinton (who also features prominently in Revelation 17 in the Bible) was “extremely careless” in her handling of classified email while she was Secretary of State, but showed no intent to break the law.

Obviously this is about as superficial an assessment of Clinton’s actions as one might concoct, based on what anyone who has been following this story closely already knows. This harridan is a ruthless, obscene, amoral criminal, but she just might wind up our next president anyway, if for no other reason than the electorate is simply not being made aware of the breadth and depth of her evil.

So, since we’re being superficial, this week I thought I’d go with something that exemplifies superficiality: Television; or more specifically, the review of a television show.

I don’t normally do reviews, but like millions of Americans who’ve dispensed with cable and satellite television subscriptions because we find it offensive to pay for Al Jazeera and other offal we wouldn’t watch with a grenade launcher poised at our heads, I have a digital antenna to pick up the few local news stations I can get here in the Rocky Mountain foothills so I’ll know when the barrage of Iranian ICBMs is about to commence.

As an entertainment alternative, I occasionally binge watch Netflix. Obviously, I’m picky even within that milieu, or I wouldn’t have given up subscription broadcast television to start with. One of the productions I really enjoyed was “Hell on Wheels,” the AMC series centered around the exploits of a former Confederate officer who headed west to work on the railroad.

The series depicts the conditions and the period reasonably faithfully (as recounted by history) without too much in the way of Hollywood anti-values incorporated therein, and it is very well done all the way around. There are both admirable and loathsome characters among all of the groups represented: the capitalists, the military personnel and former military personnel, prostitutes, Native Americans, freed slaves, Chinese and Irish immigrants, and Mormons.

One of the phenomena with which I was both fascinated and irritated (and with which all Americans should identify these days) was the series’ representation of the federal government and Union military forces that advanced the agenda of the former across the western territories. Their ruthlessness for the sake of ruthlessness was legendary, and we are aware of this because the effects thereof are still being felt today.

Leaving aside the abominable treatment Native Americans received during America’s westward expansion (for example), “Hell on Wheels” illustrated the axiom that power corrupts very well, whether portraying the stuffy, brandy-sipping railroad magnate abusing his workers, or the expatriate Chinese entrepreneur rapaciously exploiting his peasant countrymen – but it was the series’ characterization of the federal government that stood out in my mind.

In “Hell on Wheels,” the representatives of our federal government not only mercilessly implemented policies calculated to tame the frontier and bring indigent “savages” (Native Americans) under its sway, but danced a brutal flamenco all over the rights of those building the railroads in the region, landowners, and individuals as well.

This is demonstrated in part through the character of the Wyoming territorial governor John Campbell (played by Jake Weber) who, among many other scummy acts, uses his influence to buy up choice parcels of land around Cheyenne, Wyoming for his own personal aggrandizement. In this pursuit, he bullies the press, businessmen, and even local ladies of the night, ordering his deputies to vandalize a newspaper office, beat a saloon owner, and once fabricating charges against half of the men in town – including the president of the Union Pacific railroad – and barricading them in a church because the jail is too small to hold them all.

Campbell’s interpretation of the law in these matters, as evidenced via his own words, is essentially whatever he says it is, as is expedient relative to his mandate from Washington and his own ambitions and prejudices.

Sound familiar?

History confirms this deportment of policy makers of that era, and how it handily set the stage for politicians’ avaricious adventures of the following century – the narcissistic progressives for whom the Constitution was far more of an obstacle than a revered guide to just and moral governance.

The TV series illustrated not only the truism that power corrupts, but the conceit of those in the federal government at that time, and the emerging institutions therein which sought to gradually suppress the political power of both individuals and business, which had once effectively served to hold the federal government in check (In our day, many elements among these have been enrolled through guile and enticing subsidies to aid the federal government in its dirty work).

The pass on Hillary Clinton carries grave implications, not because it is being executed by those in the employ of the equally nefarious Obama administration, but because her crimes (which are a matter of public record even if the FBI chose to gloss over them) have also been tacitly endorsed by her ostensible political opponents – i.e., the Republican leadership – through their refusal to even acknowledge them. This is a stark indicator of the nascent statist megalith which has been 100 years in the making finally coming into its own.

In the aforementioned television series and the Clinton-Obama axis, we have dark cabals with no reservations with regard to ignoring the law or sweeping away opponents both large and small through subterfuge, intimidation, or even murder like so many crumbs on a dining table – and we have every reason to fear.

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
Benghazi Report: More ‘Business as Usual’

Benghazi Report: More ‘Business as Usual’

Many will remember the 1993 HBO film “And the Band Played On, ” based on the best-selling book “And the Band Played On: Politics, People, and the AIDS Epidemic” by Randy Shilts. The movie centers around a researcher for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who becomes involved in HIV/AIDS research at the inception of the epidemic in the 1980s.

The film was largely an indictment of politics within the biomedical research community; in short, the message was that “business as usual” ultimately led to innumerable AIDS deaths as politicians tested and re-tested the way the wind was blowing regarding public opinion on the disease, and prominent researchers prioritized preserving their egos, reputations, and professional legacies.

This week, a Republican-led House committee released a report the on the Sept. 11, 2012 Benghazi terror attack, citing the Obama administration’s numerous missteps before, during and after the incident. The report claims that top administration officials such as then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and President Obama hedged, waffled, and measured their public response for hours, during which time military assets waited to deploy to Libya in order to rescue U.S. staff in Benghazi.

The first military personnel did not arrive until more than 13 hours after the attack began. As a result, Ambassador Christopher Stevens, State Department information officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty perished.

The committee found the grossest breaches of protocol, obfuscation, misrepresentations, extraordinarily lame excuses, outright lies, and what appeared on its face to be abject incompetence on the part of the White House, State Department, and intelligence agencies. Panetta told the committee that “an intelligence failure” occurred with respect to Benghazi, despite dozens of desperate requests from Ambassador Stevens for enhanced security in the months prior.

Yet, there’s precious little revealed by the committee that was unknown to those following the Benghazi story. In fact, most of what the committee revealed was indeed known within a few months after the attack as a result of Middle Eastern press outlets and those directly or peripherally involved with our government’s business in Libya.

While there’s an attitude of “gotcha” in the conservative press, the report that they call “damning” gives no indication that the committee got any closer to the real reasons why our government failed to expeditiously aid those at the besieged compound. Such explanations as “intelligence failures” simply aren’t plausible. This deficiency is likely due to the extent of abject criminality behind the lack of response to the attack. For example, news pieces and commentaries following the Benghazi attack which discussed the covert Middle East arms transportation network established by the Obama administration’s CIA (to supply Islamists in Syria and for which Benghazi was a hub) and the incestuous involvement of congressional leaders, parties in the intelligence community, and private security interests are literally too many to list.

So the Benghazi report represents nothing but business as usual. Triumphant establishment press claims that the committee found no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Hillary Clinton bear this out. In the meantime, the woman who likely committed hanging offenses in the prosecution of the Benghazi response is busily marketing herself as the next “Tickle Me Elmo” – the irresistibly lovable, “gotta have” Democratic candidate President.

While 51 black citizens were injured and 7 killed over the weekend by gunfire in Chicago, a city lousy with gun control measures that’s being deftly managed by Obama’s former bath house buddy Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s communist attorney general Loretta Lynch advances her plan to make thousands of Justice Department workers submit to mandatory training calculated to eliminate “implicit biases” in their law enforcement judgment and avoid racially-motivated police actions.

In the press, liberal economists manage to maintain straight faces as they cite creative statistics and indicators which say that Barack Obama in fact did reduce the national deficit as he said he would in 2008, and that we have a robust economy – right now – as a result of his policies.

And so on. Business as usual…

Over the last couple of years, I’ve seen the homeless population in the city in which I live explode, and we’re not talking about a major urban center here. I’ve seen the lines at food banks and public assistance offices trailing out into the street, with increasing numbers of people in official work attire alongside the unlocal parasites the government demands that we feed; this indicating that while the former may have work, they clearly don’t have enough work. There’s no doubt that this is occurring across America, but we’re not likely to see much related news coverage anytime soon.

And of course, I’ve repeatedly cited the fuzzy math that allows America to have a 5% unemployment rate with 94 million unemployed out of a 180 million work force.

But it’s still business as usual…

“Nothing is more important than the safety and security of our diplomats and development officials who go into dangerous places around the world pursuing American values, interests, and our security. And I said this when I testified for 11 hours that no one has thought more about or lost more sleep over the lives that we lost, the four Americans, which was devastating… I’ll leave it to others to characterize this report, but I think it’s pretty clear it’s time to move on.”

– Hillary Clinton, June 28, 2016

So, what do these analogues and this analysis prove, if anything? They prove that despite the popular political uprisings we are seeing across the Western world, governing elites are proceeding against implicit and explicit mandates, advancing their international socialist megalith as though it was being universally welcomed by the governed.

They also prove that these parties are among the vilest of living beings. Hillary Clinton’s shameless, disgusting statement in response to the Benghazi report epitomizes this fact.

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
Western Nationalism: The Fear Factor

Western Nationalism: The Fear Factor

In practical terms, I suppose the only disagreements I’ve had lately with so-called “New World Order” conspiracy theorists have to do with some of the alleged shadowy participants cited in the plot for global domination, and the charge that the plot itself is somehow secret.

Addressing the second contention first, several key indicators of a sinister global cabal seeking to radically transform Western civilization have revealed themselves over the last few years, and even more clearly in recent months. While many analysts predicted future economic and social chaos as the European Union came into existence, it is only now that those prophecies have come to pass that the motives of European elites are clear. Obviously the Brexit movement, which seeks to extricate the United Kingdom from the swirling morass of economic and cultural disintegration that is the EU, has been a direct result of the negative effects of that nation’s membership in that doomed alliance. In America, the insurgencies within our two major political parties and the rise of Donald Trump are instances of American citizens balking at the effects of unfettered immigration, political correctness, and economic policies that compromise both America’s advantage and its sovereignty.

The point being that while conspiracy theorists’ NWO concerns have been proved valid, there hasn’t been anything particularly secret about the agenda or its implementation. While most powerful politicians have always had even more powerful private interests behind them, in this case, most of the players are known to political analysts and astute news consumers.

With regard to NWO theorists’ designation of these malevolent forces – Zionist bankers, Freemasons, and so forth – in the operational sense, these distinctions are moot. We have seen the methods at work across the West, and we know who among Western leaders have sponsored policies that compromised the sovereignty and long-term survival of their nations.

Islam has a design for global domination; in fact, one might argue that Islam itself is a design for global domination. In this context, I am not suggesting that Islam is even a key player in this scenario; rather that Islam’s innate militancy is being exploited in order to further specific objectives of the West’s elites.

The extent to which the American electorate is revolting should not be underestimated, despite this extent being minimized by the leftist press and the elite establishment. A resurgence of nationalistic tendencies is occurring in Europe, but there is scant mention of this in the European press, save for the charges of bigotry aimed at perturbed native populations.

To the cause of expanding the knowledge base of millions of frustrated and angry Americans voters (who were frustrated and angry long before Donald Trump decided to run for President), it is important that more of us recognize some common indicators and their relevance in establishing an international socialist leviathan.

Among the more prominent methods employed by both European and American governments have been:

  • Gravitation from republican-democratic governance toward oligarchical collectivism,
  • Amalgamation of economies and governments to serve the agenda of those in government and their cronies at the expense of the majority of citizens,
  • Politicians’ facilitation of mass migration into their nations by culturally-incompatible populations,
  • Summary denial of the detrimental effects of their policies, whether it’s exploding unemployment rates or increased instances of terrorism,
  • And attendant to these, the summary denial of Islamic doctrine as a motivating factor for the widespread increase in Islamist violence.

If nothing else, the continuity of method suggests a continuity of purpose. The shamelessness of those who govern in the West and the surreal distance from the truth of that which emanates from their lips has directly resulted in the popular political uprisings occurring in Europe and America.

Moving forward, it would be highly useful if those among the American electorate who understand the gravity of our situation seek to understand as well the continuity of purpose shared by American politicians and their European counterparts. It is also essential that we as individuals recognize why citizens across North America and Europe are taking such a hard look at their governance.

This is because, whether or not they comprehend the machinations as well as dedicated news junkies, these millions are responding in this manner because the road they’re traveling has begun to terrify them.

Unfortunately, though it can be a highly effective motivator, fear can also be a dangerous and unpredictable one.

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
“Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Murdering Scum…”

“Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Murdering Scum…”

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…”
– From Emma Lazarus’ poem “New Colossus” (inscription on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty)

Over the last week or so, news outlets have reported on aspects of the Obama administration’s attempts to deposit as many foreign criminal and culturally bankrupt miscreants as possible within the borders of the United States. Recently, it was reported that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has withdrawn his state from participation in the U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program. As a result, administration officials are working feverishly to execute an end run around Christie’s efforts to ameliorate the effects of the program in that state. Their apparent intent is to claim the federal government has the authority to continue resettling refugees there regardless of what New Jersey has to say.

As chummy as Chris Christie has been with Barack Hussein Obama, he obviously needs to keep his job after failing to stay in the running as a GOP presidential hopeful, and Obama isn’t going to be in office forever – so far as we know. Thus, Christie is probably bowing to internal pressure with regard to this issue.

An April 29 Fox News piece reported that the Obama administration is “bowing to international pressure and pursuing under-the-radar alternatives” toward bringing in more Syrian and other refugees this year. A March 30 “high-level meeting” on Syrian refugees in Geneva, Switzerland convened by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees saw the U.N. High Commissioner calling for countries to pursue “alternative avenues” for refugees, such as student visas, work visas, and “expanded family reunification programs.”

Which means that the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees is essentially instructing national governments in how to circumvent the will of provincial, state, local governments, and their constituencies in relocating hostile, uneducated, unskilled Muslims to Western nations. Some of these transplants will almost certainly be operatives of Islamist terror organizations, as several recent Muslim refugees in Europe proved to be.

It has been documented that since the start of hostilities in Syria in the Spring of 2011, the Obama administration admitted several thousand Syrian refugees into the U.S. and resettled them in three dozen different states. There have also been unconfirmed reports of refugees from Syria being clandestinely transported to the U.S. on commercial cargo jets on numerous occasions since then, and escorted to parts unknown by Department of Homeland Security personnel, as well as the alleged corroboration of same via the testimony of commercial cargo jet pilots speaking on the condition of anonymity.

It is indisputable that the Obama White House catalyzed widespread instability in the Middle East and parts of Africa, and thus the Muslim invasion of Europe. I have written here and elsewhere on the topic of European and Western elites’ orchestration of the European refugee crisis, and their desire to expand this to America for the purpose of coalescing power, neutralizing individual liberties, and expanding the global reach of their international socialist cabal.

In light of this, suffice it to say that the Obama administration is most assuredly not bowing to international pressure with regard to admitting more Middle Eastern and African Muslim refugees; it is not likely that much arm-twisting at all would be necessary to motivate that pack of scum in the indicated direction.

Also last week, it was reported that in 2015, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) summarily freed nearly 20,000 criminal aliens who had over 64,000 convictions between them. No explanation, no justification, not even a weak pretext articulated by the Obama administration – the scurvy mob was just released onto our streets.

We know that the Obama administration orchestrated the 2014 “unaccompanied minor” tsunami by virtue of evidence that remains readily available online. Many of these disaffected waifs (who have already cost American taxpayers an average of $17,000 each) wound up being members of violent Latin American gangs; others were incubating exotic Third World diseases from which American children later suffered after said waifs were quietly relocated to communities across America.

As I have said before, the importation of toxic individuals from around the globe to Western nations is calculated to touch off sufficiently increased trends in civil unrest, domestic terrorism, and crime that governments will have to implement ever more draconian measures to simply keep the peace.

Paradoxically, crimes committed by illegal alien criminals and assorted Islamists will be ignored as causative due to political correctness. They will also go some distance toward bolstering the left’s efforts against the Second Amendment. Many of the crimes and terror attacks will be framed as having been aided by the “easy access to guns” in America. True-believing lefties and the uninformed will certainly chime in with that chorus, particularly as circumstances worsen. As in Scandinavia, Britain and other European nations, citizens will have to go up against the imported troglodytes without the benefit of superior firepower.

In the West – in America – the remainder of the international socialists’ agenda and global expansion will take place under cover of a full-blown police state.

At least, that’s the plan…

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns