iran

The Conservative Talker at War With Himself

The Conservative Talker at War With Himself

It was last Friday, the 14th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks on America by Islamists, and the third anniversary of the attack on the American compound in Benghazi, Libya. I was listening to a conservative talking head whom I once respected rail about Senate Republicans telegraphing their intention to allow President Obama’s Iran deal to go through, and how weak the GOP leadership has been in their failure to hold Obama in abeyance. He went on to characterize Obama’s Iran policy as naïve and foolish.

That same day, I also read a post by another conservative media personality that wound up being featured by some prominent online news sources. The post, as well as some bizarre, incongruent statements this person made in the days leading up to it were of a decidedly dismal tone.

I’m not trying to pick a fight, nor am I irrevocably condemning these individuals, because they’ve done more good than a lot of people. In the latter case, we’re looking at a man who did things in his industry no one should have been expected nor able to do, especially these days. He started a streaming video network that gained enough momentum to become a cable television network, woke many Americans up to the machinations of our enemies and to the spiritual foundation of this nation, and did it all while battling some pretty serious health problems.

One of the most significant things he has articulated is that Americans must humble themselves before God if we wish to preserve this nation. With that I cannot agree more strongly, and I wish more prominent conservatives would do likewise.

Yet, by this man’s own testimony, he’s terribly disillusioned with where he is. Not with where the nation is, not with where his industry is – at this point, it’s a given that those are in the crapper – but where he is.

Now, why might that be..?

I’ll take a stab at it, and wager a lot that this assessment is correct: It’s because he’s not telling the truth anymore, and he knows it.

I don’t mean that he’s lying. What I mean is that his passion for setting America straight has become largely theoretical in that he appears to have become just another corporate media guy with a corporate media guy’s agenda. This may seem out of character, but it’s his out of character behavior of late (such as openly insulting certain individuals a lot of his fans respect and then apologizing, publishing disheartening posts, and intimating that he should withdraw from public life) that’s disturbing. For someone who had been a model of consistency, I imagine it has given some of his fans pause.

For someone who had been at the forefront of saying what needed to be said despite the risks, I found it disconcerting that whenever the topic of our odious chief executive’s true origins or eligibility arose on his show, this fellow and his on-air sidekicks would spend the next five minutes giggling – giggling – over the absurdity of anyone even considering the issues.

I don’t intend to drag us down the eligibility rabbit-hole right now, but it has been incontrovertibly established that Obama provided fraudulent identity documents to the Democratic National Committee in 2008, that high-level individuals in the DNC abetted the fraud, and that the long-form birth certificate released in 2011 is a forgery.

It is also indisputable that Obama’s allegiance is not to this nation, but to an amalgam of Marxist and Islamist ideologies and interests, including big-money Muslim concerns here and overseas who contributed in no small way to his ascendancy. Barack Obama catalyzed the Arab Spring and established ISIS as surely as John F. Kennedy launched the Peace Corps.

It has become equally clear that many high-ranking Republicans have been complicit – not weak and ineffectual, but complicit – with regard to Obama’s crimes.

But the commentator and the media mogul I mentioned aren’t talking about any of that.

It’s one thing to discuss how Obama hung out with radicals and had a black militant pastor, and how the GOP leadership has been wholly inadequate in dealing with him. But if one has a fan base of millions and they’re not discussing Obama’s serial acts of treason, then what’s the point?

If such persons can’t grasp and articulate that Obama wants a nuclear Iran in order to further destabilize the region – destabilization being an effort to which he has been steadfastly dedicated – then they’re utterly useless.

If commentators whine about what weaklings Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are, but they’re not openly discussing the complicity of high-ranking Republicans in facilitating the Benghazi attack and ongoing coverup, aiding Obama in financing, arming, and training ISIS and other terrorist groups, as well as advancing hardcore socialism whilst wearing conservative’s clothing, then they’re just as superficial and dishonest as every other so-called conservative who won’t go there.

If a conservative news outlet runs stories on the White House cooking the books on estimations of the ISIS terror group’s military strength from the viewpoint of the administration attempting to frame their efforts against ISIS more favorably, rather than their deliberately deceiving the international community to allow ISIS time to gain the strength of an army – which we now know has occurred – then they’re worse than the establishment press.

Yes… I guess I can see how someone with a conscience might consider withdrawing from public life if some factor or factors arose that, in their estimation, precluded their speaking the truth any longer – especially with the stakes as high as they are.

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns

Obama is a dangerous, psychopathic dictator – Period

hopeandchange2I agree with the last statement in the Nov. 26 editorial in Investor’s Business Daily, “Terrorist Ayers Confesses Sharing Obama’s ‘Dreams,’ in which the publication states that “It’s high time the national media started asking hard questions” with regard to whether America elected “a fiction to the White House,” and were we “victims of an elaborate con.”

The editorial describes how Obama cohort and unrepentant domestic terrorist bomber Bill Ayers has thrice admitted to having penned Obama’s “autobiographical” compendium of lies, Dreams From My Father. Leaving aside the fact that even Obama’s true parentage has yet to be determined, I find the inconsistencies cited in the editorial which speak to ethical questions pertaining to the book’s genesis and representation to the public troubling. Admittedly, misrepresenting a ghost written book is analogous to jaywalking when compared to orchestrating an EMP attack on one’s own country and murdering millions in order to coalesce political power and bring about the hundred year-long wet dream of American Marxists, but it is nevertheless a good place to start for those Americans who have yet to become aware of this creature’s duplicity and incomprehensibly malevolent designs.

In relating those designs to the American people (as opposed to continuing to act as collaborators in his crimes), the shady origins of Dreams might also be a good place for the press to start. They might then move on to the entirely synthetic story of his past, which contains so many inconsistencies and changes in the narrative itself that Obama ought not have been electable as dog catcher. Who says they have to lead with Obama’s birth certificate having been proven to be a fraudulent device?

As this counterfeit American president continues to attempt to defray suspicion and conceal his treason and lies, I intend to continue to expound upon that treason and those lies. I will also continue to assert that those in government and in the press who have failed to reveal Obama for what he is – considering his actions, the evidence of history, and the damning evidence against Obama which is readily available – richly deserve to share in whatever penalties are meted out to traitors and their enablers. I will continue to do this despite the risks and pathetic Alinskyite Marxist ridicule of those whom I pray one day occupy prison cells on the same block as the man representing himself as Barack Hussein Obama.

Posted by Erik Rush in News