Pedophiles: The Next Protected Minority Group

Pedophiles: The Next Protected Minority Group

With regard to its designs for our nation, debasement has been the name of the game for the political left for a long time. While volumes could be written on the moral debasement alone catalyzed by the left, America’s standing in the world, our economy, our educational system, our worldview and collective self-image, among many other things, have been targets for incremental debasement by the left.

When liberals began targeting the sexual attitudes of our population through mass media and junk science such as Alfred Kinsey’s perverted sex studies, suddenly the worst thing one could be was a prude, and the accusation was thrown around almost as liberally (no pun intended) as “homophobe” has been in recent years. In retrospect, we can see that both were part of the same stratagem of shaming ideological opponents into acquiescence.

Lately, the news has been replete with how the civil rights of transgendered people are being trod upon by narrow-minded state governments and the bigoted straight majority. In a truly perverse turn of events, even the term “transgendered” has become nebulous; it is no longer employed to reference pre-operative transsexuals, but people who have chosen to represent as the opposite of their biological gender. The term “transvestite” doesn’t fit the bill, either; these are people who claim to literally identify as the opposite gender – at least at present.

While this liberally-lubricated political football (again, no pun intended) defies logical interpretation and has given rise to truly bizarre and inane grandstanding on the part of everyone from chain stores to rock stars, it is nothing compared to what is next coming down the pike: legitimizing, and then ultimately decriminalizing pedophilia, or child molestation.

Preposterous, sayest thou?

Case in point 1: Last September, WND’s Matt Barber detailed how the Obama administration’s Department of Defense was facilitating the homosexual abuse of young boys at the hands of Muslim allies in Afghanistan, and how U.S. servicemen who attempted to blow the whistle on attendant policies were being drummed out of the service. Lest any take exception to the source, Barber widely cited a New York Times article on the same topic, which revealed that these atrocious acts were even occurring on U.S. military bases in Afghanistan.

Case in point 2: When the notoriously liberal American Psychiatric Association made a furtive attempt to reclassify pedophilia as a sexual orientation rather than a mental illness in the 2013 version of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5 or DSM-V), the outcry from medical professionals and the public was so strong that the APA essentially said that it had all been some sort of mistake, and released a statement that the erroneous use of the phrase “sexual orientation” would be corrected.

Case in point 3: British children are being kidnapped by Muslim men for exploitation as child prostitutes and sex slaves. I say “British children” as opposed to “children in Britain” because these louts apparently prefer white kids. Law enforcement has been hampered in its efforts to stop this practice because prosecuting these crimes entails revealing the perpetrators as Muslims. The disgustingly liberal British government, which now includes plenty of Muslims, maintains that this is “racist.”

The latter example is illustrative of the progression that occurs: In Britain, they began importing Muslims decades before America saw an influx of Muslims. Thus, by virtue of their numbers alone, they now have political as well as cultural influence – and children suffer.

It is a slippery slope from overlooking pedophilia out of political correctness because it is an age-old albeit disgusting cultural practice among one minority group to permitting the same outright within the entire population. In America, this will be even more of a dangerous proposition because there are pedophilia advocacy groups just waiting in the wings for their shot at protected minority status.

Obviously, if Islamists have anything to say about it, this will be moot, since the entire population will eventually be Muslim – but I digress. Debasement is still the name of the game, and rest assured that power players on the left relish the advent of such a scenario. In the end, getting molested by the neighborhood pervert or groomed by a kiddie porn ring will be as common for a child as a scuffle with a schoolmate.

As for the elite ruling class, anyone coming in contact with their children will be vetted six ways from Sunday. The former middle class – the enslaved, seething, ignorant masses – well, we’ll have to fend for ourselves. Taking out the neighborhood pervert with a baseball bat will of course be grounds for prosecution.

I have little doubt that my claims will be taken as a wild, paranoid supposition by my detractors on the left, and that some will assert that I am advocating for the mass murder of some faction or other. If one examines the left’s modus operandi to date and the incremental nature of everything they’ve done however, the same liberal that called his or her neighbor a “homophobe” yesterday and a “transphobe” today will be calling them a “pedophilophobe” tomorrow.

How and whether or not Americans resolve to protect their children from government-sanctioned sexual abuse in the future rests in whether or not they acknowledge who our enemies really are in a timely enough fashion.

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
What Really Drives the LGBT Agenda

What Really Drives the LGBT Agenda

In light of the controversy over North Carolina’s “transgender bathroom bill” and the spirited legal activism ostensibly concerning the civil rights of homosexuals over the past few years, many wonder why there is such a high degree of concern over these issues, given that this faction represents less than 4 percent of the population in America.

Particularly in the case of the new North Carolina law – the Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act – which prevents individuals who identify as “transgender” (excluding post-operative transsexuals) from using public restrooms based on their preferred gender identity of the week, the blowback has been puzzling.

It might be expected that someone like rock icon Bruce Springsteen (Sorry, fans; he’s always been a no-talent bum in my estimation, but I established myself as a musical snob long ago) might do something like peremptorily canceling his band’s tour date in Greensboro, North Carolina, in solidarity with the LGBT community, but New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio also found it necessary to issue bans on nonessential government travel to North Carolina to protest the law – which, by the way, is being universally referenced as an “anti-LGBT measure” by the establishment press. Forget the fact that a key argument for the law was to keep pedophiles and sexual predators (i.e., “counterfeit transgenderites”) out of the wrong public restrooms.

So, why is the political left so concerned about the supposed rights of homosexuals, transvestites and assorted sexual deviants?

Well, here’s why – and it’s quite simple: Leaders on the left are aware that a socialist state must be the sole arbiter of morality. It must be able to decree absolutely anything and establish any social convention it deems appropriate, including that which many in any given social order would consider profoundly amoral or primally repellant.

Presently, there’s a faction for whom the State will never reign supreme, because the members thereof honor and obey the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Thus, in the eyes of those advancing the socialist state, these people must be disenfranchised and their doctrine neutralized. In America, this faction primarily comprises Christians, who are a majority.

So, how do those advancing the socialist state go about disenfranchising a majority of millions? They go about it in the same manner as was employed in Europe and in Canada: A scenario is represented by means of propaganda wherein the habits or practices of one faction become at odds with the established civil liberties of the majority – in this case, the religious protections afforded Christians under the Constitution. The majority is then targeted on the pretext that their liberties are manifestly oppressive to this faction – in this case, homosexuals, transvestites and assorted sexual deviants.

Then, widespread sympathy is engendered on the part of the populace for the minority faction by demonizing the majority for their oppression of the minority, even if this is not occurring. Sufficient support for the minority faction is created to facilitate citizens’ endorsement of legal measures protecting the “rights” (practices) of the minority faction; this necessarily negates the civil liberties of the majority, which itself will be reticent to protest out of fear of being further demonized.

This opens the door to ever-increasing institutional oppression of the majority faction and encroachment of the now-legal rights of the minority faction upon them on the basis that the majority previously abused their liberties in oppressing the minority faction. Members of the majority group eventually become persona non grata, and many if not all of their doctrine becomes suspect and stigmatized.

Have I overlooked anything?

Ultimately, all of the liberties once enjoyed by the majority are targeted for negation via the courts; if these involve religious practices, the religion is essentially driven underground. This may or may not be sufficient for the designs and intentions of the State; this is predicated wholly upon the degree of power the leaders desire to wield and the control they wish to exercise, all to the end of maintaining their sway.

Once this has been accomplished, not only does the doctrine of the majority no longer effectively supersede the will of the State, but the State is now free to impose secular doctrines, laws and regulations that are more conducive to state control and manipulation of the populace in every area of their lives.

Thus, it becomes clear that the “struggle for LGBT rights” in America is and has always been nothing more than a pretext for the complete disenfranchisement of Christians. Gauging by what has occurred in other Western nations, and observing that the same methodology was in fact employed in these countries, there is no reason that any thinking person would fail to come to the same conclusion.

Originally published in WorldNetDaily

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns