Evidence Liberals Hate People

Evidence Liberals Hate People

By Erik Rush •

Considering the extent to which the political left kvetched well into Barack Obama’s presidency on the topic of George W. Bush having ruined America, some commentators find ourselves a bit reticent to do likewise regarding Obama and the state in which our nation now finds itself despite the fact that Obama richly deserves such criticism, and then some.

That said, it does occur to me that the monumental exertions being put forth on the part of the establishment press and liberal politicos toward derailing Donald Trump’s presidency would have been more appropriately applied to the high crimes committed by the Obama administration. Indeed, they would not have needed to engage in all of the futile excavation in which they now engage in order to find some nefarious tidbit with which to oust Trump, since Obama’s offenses were legion.

Additionally, the level of the left’s projection – accusing political opponents of transgressions of which they are themselves guilty – has reached an all-time high in recent months. In a way, the calumnies against Trump and dogged persistence in trying to bring him down are aspects of the aforementioned projection, but the left’s proclivity toward all of the distasteful practices of which they accuse Trump and the political right are far more telling in this regard.

Every now and then, a prominent liberal articulates something so damning and precisely illustrative of their twisted vision that one wonders how they let it pass their lips. Well, liberals aren’t known for being terribly reflective or judicious with regard to their rhetoric, and the last few months of advocating violence against political opponents is indicative of this.

Last Friday, HBO’s Bill Maher stated on his cable TV show that refraining from having children was the best thing a person could do for the environment. “Because you know what Mother Nature loves even more than electric cars?” Maher asked. “Condoms. There’s literally nothing you can do that’s better for the environment than to not produce another resource-sucking, waste-making human being, probably with a bad attitude.”

Well, I for one am delighted that Maher himself decided to put his money where his mouth is (or put his reproductive concerns where his mouth is) and elected not to reproduce, but the point is that his statements reveal the deep misanthropy that most liberals appear to possess.

Despite their mantra of love, tolerance, and egalitarianism, liberals hate people. Indeed, many of the deceptions liberal politicians, pundits, and activists foist upon their followers are employed based upon the premise that the latter are so abysmally stupid that they’ll never detect these deceptions. This sweeping judgment obviously evidences a low opinion of people that is antithetical to their supposed creed of love, tolerance, and egalitarianism.

While eternally pessimistic leftists such as Maher would inevitably find people, places, and things with which they could find offense no matter how “Utopian” they managed to make society, they still envision themselves finding peace and contentment in a world wherein their political opponents were either completely disenfranchised or had somehow magically departed from this plane of existence. Given their maturity and intellectual bent, one may presume that these enemies would either ride off on unicorns, slide into oblivion on the handiest rainbow, or wind up abducted in the night by wee dark faeries.

Christians might find that this philosophy rings rather Luciferian in context. Judeo-Christian convention states that the Devil was jealous of humanity’s position in the eyes of God, and so eternally seeks to corrupt and destroy human beings. This is quite in keeping with liberals’ misanthropy, as well as their desire to advance absolutely anything that is antithetical to Judeo-Christian doctrine.

Liberals demonstrate their disdain for humanity primarily through the environmental movement, wherein the very presence of human beings on the planet is viewed as a vile plague. This is readily exemplified in the rhetoric environmentalists typically employ. Bill Maher’s reference to people as “resource-sucking” and “waste-making” denotes this quite effectively.

This is also consistent with how the political left perennially advances morbidity, or aspects of death. Unfettered abortion, assisted suicide, and substandard health care are among these. Enabling the mayhem in which Islamists, illegal immigrants, and even common criminals engage is another. Finally, a few weeks ago at a baseball practice in Virginia, we witnessed that to which leftists have always defaulted at some point during their political ascendency: Outright murder (or attempted murder, in this case). The political left’s position regarding the death penalty (they’re against it) has much more to do with their disdain for the law than any concern for the sanctity of life.

As I’ve said before and will no doubt say again: Leftists murdered, maimed, and enslaved half a billion people during the last century. This demonstrates not only their innate disregard for human life, but the phenomenon of projection in their ceaseless accusations that those on the political right in America are inherently violent. The empirical evidence however, speaks for itself.

Originally published in WorldNetDaily

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
Why There Can Be No Coexistence With The Left

Why There Can Be No Coexistence With The Left

Assuming they can take a break from bitterly clinging to their guns and religion for a few minutes, I’m going to set a bona fide goal for those liberty-loving Americans out there with a passion for our founding principles and the Constitution. What may surprise some in that camp is that it’s the very same goal toward which those on the political left strive.

At first blush, some of these patriots – perhaps many – will find this goal rhetorically indelicate, if not undemocratic, or even (dare I say it?) – “extreme.”

By the time they’re done reading this, however, I would hope that they perceive the dangerous folly in such thinking.

The goal is simple, and it is as follows: We must utterly vanquish the political opponents we currently face. One can see why I said it’s identical to the ultimate goal of the left, and why they never articulate it openly. While they espouse love of country, liberty, the democratic process and say they believe we have as much of a right to our ideals and beliefs as they do theirs, these are patent deceptions.

Time and again, their actions make it abundantly clear that they intend to eradicate our ideals and beliefs if at all possible.

So, as contrary to our model of government and collective conscience as this may sound, utterly neutralizing the left (completely disenfranchising those who ascribe to leftist doctrine and dismantling all of their established political, cultural and legal constructs) is an imperative because they never had any intention of coexisting with those of differing ideologies.

A key difference between us and the political left is that we’ve always been here, but they have not. What I mean by this is that throughout the history of our nation, the intentions of the governed and those who rose to govern were fairly closely aligned. There were instances of major divergence – such as those who wound up at odds over slavery or the right of women to vote – but principally, we had somewhat differing means to generally the same ends.

Though the left-right paradigm with which contemporary Americans were raised has come to mean less and less (because so many politicians advance leftist policies regardless of political party), we do need to bear in mind that it is a very recent political model.

The reason politicians have perpetuated the observance of this left-right archetype in recent years is because it became eminently useful to them in manipulating the electorate – and this means big-government closet socialists like many prominent Republicans have demonstrated themselves to be, as well as outright communists like Barack Obama and his co-conspirators.

The core truth is that the ideology, motives and methods of the left are manifestly evil, and always have been.

I don’t know if I coined the phrase in relation to liberalism being “communism on the installment plan,” but I don’t know of anyone else who uses it. Whoever gets the credit, I believe it is an accurate statement because not only has liberalism itself changed incrementally over the last several decades, it has also managed to subvert those occupying other nodes along the political continuum.

This is because liberalism (as opposed to early 20th-century progressivism) has always been driven by hardcore communists. Because they are intrinsically diabolical, they misrepresent their intentions, then foment division, hatred and civil unrest. Finally, they institutionalize injustice, oppressing and terrorizing the governed, illegally appropriating the fruits of their labors and making atrocity commonplace.

This is why in 1983, President Ronald Reagan referred to the Soviet Union as an “evil empire.” It wasn’t a case of baseless name-calling.

With the end of the Cold War, many Americans presumed that the struggle against communism was over. I’m not sure why, since potent communistic influences remained in the world. In any event, I seriously doubt that in the early 1990s many conservatives could have imagined a Marxist-Leninist cabal calling the shots in our nation’s capital less than 20 years hence.

The empirical evidence demonstrates that liberalism inevitably morphs into communism (oligarchical collectivist totalitarianism). Whether it comes about quickly through revolution or slowly through attrition doesn’t matter much in the end.

Thus, liberalism is fundamentally just as malignant as communism – which we should have been able to ascertain, given that its effects over the last 50 years included increasing moral ambivalence, escalating levels of corruption in government and business sectors, class warfare, dissolution of the family (including high rates of divorce and illegitimate births), loss of reverence for the sanctity of life, rampant drug use, antipathy for the nation itself and transposition of the very concepts of good and evil.

And those only represent the evidence of America’s domestic deterioration.

I hope this has sufficiently illustrated that the liberal-embryonic-communist wholesale destroyers of everything good and decent have not always been among us. Those who follow evil dictates have always been among us, but never before in America have we seen a faction bent on pernicious societal nihilism achieve enduring influence and political power.

Those who are generally peaceful, industrious and generous, who would prefer to mind their own business as they pursue life, liberty and happiness have always been here. Actually, they are most people. Knowledge of this truth is what motivated our nation’s founders to so inextricably enshrine the concepts of individual liberty and Natural Law into its founding documents.

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns

Liberals killed Trayvon Martin, and Jamiel Shaw, and…

trayvon_jamiel1What we do know for sure about the night of February 26, 2012 is that George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin to death in Sanford, Florida, later claiming self-defense. Despite altogether too many having made up their minds about who was to blame within minutes of hearing of the incident, and the biased, tainted press reports, enough facts have subsequently shaken out that I believe a reliable determination can now be made as to why Martin died that night.

Other than the summary accusations and presumptions of racism on Zimmerman’s part, very little has come to light towards definitively affirming the mixed-race (Latino-Caucasian) neighborhood watch participant as a racist individual. Quite the opposite, in fact: Zimmerman’s actions and activities in the weeks and years prior suggest that he was anything but racially-biased.

Given the statutes governing those possessing concealed carry permits for firearms (as did Zimmerman), the names of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman would have been long forgotten by now were it not for the ensuing politicization surrounding the racial component here. Typically, these statutes do not demand that one waits to be physically overpowered before discharging their weapon.

Read more…

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns, Racism