Michelle Obama

‘Fundamental Transformation’ Was Fundamentally Evil

‘Fundamental Transformation’ Was Fundamentally Evil

By Erik Rush

While substituting for radio talk-show host Glenn Beck last week, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, Sheriff David Clarke pointed to the manifestly unsuitable presidential candidate that was Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 and compared the reaction of Obama detractors to his election with leftists’ response to the recent election of real estate mogul and media personality Donald Trump to the presidency.

Despite deep concerns many had over Obama’s political deficiencies in 2008, Clarke noted that when Obama won the presidency, his political opponents did not claim that Obama had somehow stolen the election. They did not whine about shadowy foreign groups having helped him win, even though a very compelling case could be made that this did in fact occur through the influence of certain Saudi agencies at particular stages of his career. They did not protest in the streets. They did not produce fearmongering public service announcements asking Democratic electors to flip their votes or refuse to certify Obama’s victory. They did not appear on television and radio news and talk shows presenting entirely baseless, utterly preposterous charges against the new president-elect, though the truth about his lack of fitness to hold any high office would have horrified a preponderance of the voting public had they been aware of it.

For my part, I don’t recall any of that occurring either, nor do I remember Obama supporters being beaten at rallies by supporters of John McCain in 2008, or college freshmen being driven out of school by bullying over their support for Obama, (as was Bryn Mawr College student Andi Moritz over her support for Donald Trump).

In the case of Trump’s recent election, Sheriff Clarke opined, leftists engaged in each and every one of these craven acts. As most readers know, Sheriff Clarke is a black man; while this ought not matter in terms of his articulating the truth, it is significant in light of the fact that most black Americans have been so brainwashed by progressives that their cognitive processes with regard to political, social and cultural issues often suggest a sort of mental retardation.

Also last week, a few conservative pundits commented on recent remarks made by another black American, our outgoing abysmal excuse for a first lady, Michelle Obama. Addressing Trump’s impending presidency and her perception of our nation without her husband at the helm, Mrs. Obama’s statements came off as boilerplate sour grapes on the part of a racialist who is incapable of admitting that conditions are appreciably better for blacks today than they were in 1955.

The woman who once said that she’d felt no pride in being an American until her husband was nominated for president is singing the same song again now that her gravy train ride is about over, whining about blacks’ ongoing struggle against alleged institutional racism. This despite her family having lived lives that few Americans of any color ever get to live.

The fact is that “enough” is never enough for those on the left. This mental modality has been imparted to nearly everyone in that region of the political continuum, even those who do not understand the stratagem behind their socialist overlords having employed it.

For example, nearly all of the black Americans who still vote for Democrats in the 90 percents, from celebrities to welfare queens, hold to Michelle Obama’s viewpoint to varying degrees. At this juncture, one could gift each and every black American with $1 billion, tax-free (due reparation, some would surely argue), and they would continue citing their alleged oppression. Partying in rarified venues with rap stars and other liberal billionaires, they would claim that their lot in life could be just a little bit better if not for the pernicious institutional racism that still exists in America.

So what’s the beef? It’s obviously not about money. Despite being ostensible haters of capitalism, leftists are among the most money-grubbing individuals on the planet – but if it were truly about money, their vociferousness would abate once they’d achieved material success. If it were about money, Bill and Hillary Clinton, former Vice-President Al Gore and even billionaire currency manipulator and former Nazi collaborator George Soros would have ceased whining once their own economic security was assured.

But they never do …

So it’s not money they really crave – it’s power. The profoundly narcissistic concept that their worldview is superior to all others and that they have the right to impose it upon everyone else has very little to do with any intellectual appraisal of socialism; in the absence of such a system, they would have gravitated to some other political philosophy, probably equally as odious, and attempted to impose that one upon the populace. Even many rank-and-file liberals subscribe to socialism’s unethical and intrusive doctrines because of the power they envision sharing, and we’ve seen them revel in components thereof that have been implemented to one degree or another: telling their fellow citizens that they may no longer speak or worship freely, own guns, smoke tobacco, or consume what their leaders have deemed is too much sugar for one’s own good.

The desire to ruthlessly wield such power not only runs counter to the long-established law of our land (namely, the Constitution), it is a pursuit that bespeaks a character that is fundamentally evil.

Moving forward in the spirit of America’s rage against the socialist political machine (which led to Donald Trump’s election), I will continue to point out that having set us on this path is not a First Amendment right to which liberals and socialists are entitled. It is amoral, and it is treason. This must first become recognition on a popular level, and finally, conventional wisdom.

Originally published in WorldNetDaily

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
Michelle’s Rant and the Orchestrated Racial Crisis

Michelle’s Rant and the Orchestrated Racial Crisis

The White House finally had a cop-on-black-citizen tragedy occur right in their backyard in Freddie Gray, the 25-year-old who died in police custody last month, and so the administration was able to exploit it to the fullest. Not only is Baltimore geographically close to Washington, D.C., but its municipal government is chock-full of uber-left, affirmative-action, Obama-worshiping characters.

The city’s “investigation” into six Baltimore police officers who arrested and transported Gray on April 12 was sketchy, yet on April 30, Baltimore City State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby announced numerous charges against the officers.

On April 28, recently confirmed Attorney General Loretta Lynch stated that the ongoing crisis involving police and urban black populations is “one of the most challenging issues of our time.”

Spoken like a true apparatchik… and why not? We already know that Lynch is a radical with no professional ethics whatsoever, as substantiated by evidence that emerged during her confirmation process.

The president has been catching flak for having honored Freddie Gray by sending three White House representatives to his funeral, and similarly honoring Michael Brown last year, while neglecting to send anyone to the funerals of several police officers killed in the line of duty in recent months. One would have to be profoundly gullible to believe that these instances of “careless disregard” were oversights.

So, the White House loves thugs, hates cops, and no one seems to care. What else is new, right?

Well, now I’m wondering precisely what the Obama White House working protocol is relating to these funerals: Is it four White House representatives if you were a real badass black thug, three if you were an “average” black thug, maybe two for a dead white thug of some repute, one for a black cop, whereas white cops slain in the line of duty get nothing?

I guess we’ll see when they get around to memorializing Liquori Tate, the black Hattiesburg, Mississippi, police officer who was fatally shot, allegedly, by young black vermin during a traffic stop on May 9.

I’ll have to admit that First Sasquatch Michelle Obama outdid her husband concerning racialist gaffes in one fell swoop over the weekend, when she bloviated at length before a lectern at Tuskegee University. Her so-called commencement address was largely a stream of self-pitying, self-righteous, bitter, paranoid racialist propaganda.

Whining ad nauseum about such horrors as having been mistrusted, talked down to, underestimated and perennially under some suspicion, all because of the color of her skin (at least this was her perception), Michelle O underscored it all with audience identification aplenty, and intimations that “it ain’t over yet.”

And how she and Barack suffered over the years under the yoke of institutional racism! From staff who allegedly “kept a close eye” on them in department stores, to those who still question their “love for America,” the couple’s self-esteem has been under unremitting assault for decades.

If the level of contrivance here hasn’t utterly overpowered, let’s take a closer look:

“The road ahead is not going to be easy. It never is, especially for folks like you and me. Because while we’ve come so far, the truth is that those age-old problems are stubborn, and they haven’t fully gone away.” – Michelle Obama, May 9

Let’s compare this to a line from the president’s April 28 speech on the same subject:

“This has been going on for a long time. This is not new, and we shouldn’t pretend that it’s new.” – Barack Obama, April 28

Translated: Hey, you darkies know nothin’s changed since 1955, don’t ya?

And how uncannily similar.

The tragic dynamic at work here: When you have blacks exploiting other blacks in this manner, the exploited are uniquely vulnerable. The reason for this is that given the history of blacks in America, most simply can’t imagine another black individual sinking that low.

But that’s who Marxists are; their quest for power trumps race. The bigger picture shows that what is happening comes from an even lower realm …

“[T]hose claiming to have the solution will ultimately create the racial tension they ostensibly seek to eradicate … which is exactly what they want.”

“Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal – America’s Racial Obsession,” by Erik Rush, page 85

Although some of us have been bringing what follows to light for some time, the processes have definitely stepped up since the 2014 Ferguson riots. Based on this administration’s character and agenda, and our knowledge of what’s going on behind the scenes, it is plain that this crisis of escalating racial tension is being deftly orchestrated by the White House itself.

In 2009, WND’s Jerome Corsi practically prophesied what is developing right now when he wrote (quotes I also included in “Negrophilia,” by the way):

“Advancing their socialist revolutionary aims, Cloward and Piven explained the crisis they sought ‘can occur spontaneously (e.g., riots) or as the intended result of tactics of demonstration and protest. …’

“The Cloward-Piven strategy sought to apply the tactics of the revolutionary civil-rights movement, including urban riots, to the poor as a whole. …”

Once again: All of this is going toward catalyzing sufficient civil unrest to justify nationwide federal intervention. Some of the methods are less subtle than others, and I have identified many in this space over the last few years.

Considering the foregoing, we should not take it at all lightly that the Rev. Al Sharpton has been openly advocating for a national police force simply because he’s a buffoon. Like Obama and other key players in this tragic comedy, Sharpton has long-standing ties to old, well-established, powerful New York communists who aided in his dubious rise to prominence – which is definitely no coincidence.

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns