Orlando: Obama’s Tirade & Liberalism’s Malignancy

Orlando: Obama’s Tirade & Liberalism’s Malignancy

On Sunday, Omar Mateen, a 29-year-old resident of Florida who was of Afghan extraction, entered the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida armed to the teeth, killed 50 people and wounded more than 50 others before he was gunned down by law enforcement officers. The shooting is being called the worst mass shooting in our country’s history.

Omar Mateen was also a devout Muslim.

At first, the attack was seen as having been motivated by Islamic doctrine condemning homosexuals, particularly since the Pulse was chiefly frequented by people in Orlando’s gay community. It was also reported that the FBI in Orlando had become aware of Mateen in 2013, when co-workers alleged that he may have ties to terrorism, and that Mateen had recently sworn allegiance to the ISIS terror group.

Mateen was described by a former colleague as an “unhinged and unstable” person who regularly made racist, misogynist and homophobic remarks. Yet, the same individual also described Mateen as a devout Muslim who brought a prayer mat to work and prayed several times a day.

Subsequently, testimony surfaced placing Mateen at the Pulse on numerous occasions in the recent past, carousing with patrons there, and communicating with some of them through gay online chat and dating applications.

So, was Omar Mateen a devout Muslim, a jihadi, and possibly a member of ISIS? Was he a conflicted, self-loathing homosexual? Was he mentally ill? If the latter, his behavior was still consistent with quite a few Muslims who went on to commit murder in the name of Islam. According to reports released by the FBI on Tuesday, the attack was at least well-planned and involved the indirect involvement of Mateen’s wife, who is now cooperating with law enforcement.

Within hours of the massacre, President Barack Hussein Obama was standing before reporters in the White House briefing room, completely ignoring Mateen’s Islamist bent, but parroting activists’ calls for more gun control and blaming Mateen’s actions on the easy access to firearms in America.

This example of institutional denial did not sit well with some however, and when Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump renewed his call for a moratorium on Muslim immigration and some in the GOP complained about Obama’s refusal to call a spade a spade with regard to Islamic terrorism, Obama reacted on Tuesday with a petulant tirade against those who’ve criticized him in this area.

Speaking from the White House, Obama said that “There’s no magic to the phrase of radical Islam,” which he said is merely “a political talking point.” Obama made the nebulous claim that his reluctance to use the phrase “radical Islam” has “nothing to do with political correctness and everything to do with actually defeating extremism.” He also asserted that indentifying acts such as the Orlando and Santa Barbara shootings as examples of Islamic extremism would somehow validate and empower Islamic extremists and groups like ISIS, who “want to claim that they are the true leaders of over a billion Muslims who reject their crazy notions.”

Obama’s attempt to explain the delicate tone of his references to the actions of militant Islamists to date reflects a policy of incoherent rhetoric, one which not only minimizes the threat of Islamic terrorism, but mischaracterizes its nature and often draws a fallacious equivalency between the threat posed by Islamists and that posed by right wing extremists, even placing the actions of truly unhinged mass murderers with no political agenda in the “Right Wing Extremist” column in order to validate this convoluted logic.

Indeed, neither history nor the ongoing silence of “over a billion Muslims” give any indication whatsoever that they reject militants’ “crazy notions.”

Obama also played the “American Values Card,” claiming that moves to limit Muslim immigration or single out Muslims in America as a threat “betrays the very values America stands for.” This was echoed by Republican House Speaker and treasonous invertebrate Paul Ryan, who said on Tuesday that “I do not think a Muslim ban is in our country’s interest.”

These positions are in keeping with the agenda of international socialist elites in government who have been facilitating Islamic militancy in order to destabilize their nations and necessitate draconian policies in the interest of public safety. In short, their efforts are calculated to bring about a police state. The dogged efforts of the Obama administration in blaming the access Americans have to firearms for this violence is a clear indicator of that strategy. One can only imagine the kind of nation we will have when guns become scarce, Americans are at the mercy of murderous Muslims, and law enforcement is loath to intercede over political correctness, but the prospect is chilling to say the very least.

Unfortunately, this policy of incoherent rhetoric also plays upon the predilection for denial which many in the West possess.

I’ve used the phrase “liberalism is communism [or socialism] on the installment plan” fairly frequently. For all I know, I may have coined the phrase. While even many conservatives may be skeptical of what I deem an inevitable progression, the empirical evidence bears it out.

The bottom line is that the American people must wake up to the fact that we are at war against Islam, and against international socialism. Muslims and socialists are our enemies, and both of the major political parties are lousy with the latter. Rank and file political liberals, as agents of the incremental ascendancy of socialism, are also the enemy, no matter how innocuous they may attempt to make themselves appear, or how benign we may want to believe they and their intentions are.

Originally published in WorldNetDaily

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
The West’s Compulsion for Societal Suicide

The West’s Compulsion for Societal Suicide

Perhaps it’s my twisted imagination, but I can’t help observing current geopolitical machinations and wonder what individuals from another juncture in history or even a non-Earthbound civilization might conclude about our society and, more importantly, those who currently hold power and preeminence among us.

There are things occurring on the geopolitical scene that simply do not merit debate over what is actually transpiring, yet on a daily basis, these are being misrepresented by political leaders, media, the press, and even religious leaders to such a degree that it is surreal beyond description.

One of the most noteworthy examples of this phenomenon has been our scurvy knave of a low-born, treasonous scoundrel president, Barack Hussein Obama, as he attempts to characterize Muslim populations as benign and assimilable. Specifically, I refer to Obama’s recent rhetoric in light of the massive uptick in terror attacks by Muslims over the last several years. He’s found it necessary to admonish Americans not to hold animosity nor suspicion toward “America’s Mooslims” as a result of their worldwide terror attacks, their ongoing invasion of Europe, and the tinderbox that they have made of the Middle East and parts of Africa. Presumably this is toward strengthening his argument for allowing untold numbers of Muslim “refugees” into the United States.

It bordered on hysterical (as in outrageously humorous) a couple of days ago when Obama reminded us once again of the “many contributions” that Muslims have made to the rich history of our country. I defy anybody to name one significant contribution that Muslims have made to this nation – with the qualifier that it is a positive contribution.

To the east, European socialist leaders refuse to acknowledge the damage to life, limb, and their economies being done by over a million invaders who should have been strafed as their raggedy columns approached the borders of prospective host nations.

“All of us together, Muslims, Hindus, Catholics, Copts, Evangelical brothers and sisters — children of the same God — we want to live in peace, integrated…”

– Pope Francis’ Easter Address, March 27

All want to live in peace, integrated? I beg to differ, since the Muslim faction included in Pope Francis’ Easter Address clearly have no desire to integrate.

I’ve always had a great respect for the Catholic Church, and I understand the reality of modern popes being political as much as spiritual leaders, but I am about a hair’s breadth away from declaring this pontiff an apostate Christian. In both his Christmas and Easter addresses, Pope Francis excoriated those who wish to prevent migrants from the Middle East and North Africa from entering Europe, even as they run roughshod over the nations of that continent. He has paid gratuitous, embarrassing deference to the world’s smirking, treacherous Muslim leaders, and although the pope has condemned the recent persecution (rape, maiming, murder, enslavement, etc.) of Christians in the Middle East by Muslims, he has spent just as much time misrepresenting Islam as benign as his contemporary political leaders have.

So is this pope stupid, naïve, or evil?

Last week, the Detroit Free Press reported that Muslim parents of elementary school students in Dearborn, Michigan became upset after their children received flyers promoting an Easter Egg hunt at a local church. While attending public elementary schools in New York during the 1960s, I cannot count the number of handouts I received for events celebrating religious holidays that my family did not celebrate. No one got intimidated, no one got offended, and no one went crying to The New York Times.

But you see, Muslims have made significant inroads into politics in Michigan, so they can afford to be uppity in that state. They’ve also become savvy to the practices employed by every other special interest group in the American left’s big tent: Claim persecution, gain sympathy, secure genuinely unconstitutional protections under the law, and then you’re free to persecute your political opponents.

So, the poor, intimidated little Muslim parents went to the press, complaining that their childrens’ virgin eyes falling upon these horrid, blasphemous Easter flyers was somehow a form of religious persecution that naturally violates the Constitution.

Clever, aren’t they? Well, that’s how it starts. Give it a decade or two, and Muslims in America will have earned the right to Sharia courts, to rape non-Muslim women at will, to kidnap non-Muslim children for use as sex slaves, and to behead American servicemen in broad daylight, just as they have in Britain, Europe, and Scandinavia.

For the record: Although a link to the Detroit Free Press story now defaults to the publication’s home page for some unfathomable reason, other online news outlets did pick it up.

Where those whom we have trusted with our governance and safety should now be ever more committed to the support and defense of the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and bearing true faith and allegiance to the same, it is apparently more important that they show solidarity with the miniscule number of Americans who oppose an obscure state law blocking individuals from using public bathrooms that don’t match their biological gender, and campaign against the scourge of microaggressions.

What might those from another time in history or some exotic, off-world civilization conclude about us? Clearly, that we in the West are suffering from a form of mass insanity manifesting in a compulsion for societal suicide.

Why any society, in any age, or on any conceivable world, would choose such a path is, I’m afraid, a question that’s above my current pay grade.

Originally published in WorldNetDaily

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
Muslims Grateful to the West? Never!

Muslims Grateful to the West? Never!

Last week, some entertainment industry ignoramuses sought to “enhance their optics” via a display of solidarity with Muslim migrants amidst what the left has sold as a hateful response to the migrants’ presence by some Europeans. A refugee camp in Calais, France had gained some notoriety and was scheduled for demolition by French authorities. Known as “The Jungle,” the camp was visited by British actor Jude Law and a handful of other celebrities who called on the British government to admit select refugees from the camp into Britain.

Things went south however: No sooner had cameras stopped rolling after the festivities than a group of the beleaguered migrants attacked. As reported by the UK’s Mirror, they assaulted a security team attending the entertainers, pelting them with rocks and robbing them.

The ignorance of entertainers and liberal culture of the industry aside, those in the West are being rather forcefully admonished to ignore the empirical evidence, which illustrates the folly of the West welcoming migrants from Muslim nations into their own.

Muslims have a long history of stabbing their benefactors in the back. Islamic lore is replete with instances of Allah “softening the hearts” of potentates and populations whom they later fell upon and decimated.

During the Clinton administration, the war in the Balkan states was headline news for at least two years. In March 1992, when Bosnia-Herzegovina became an independent republic, Bosnian Serbs rebelled, and hostilities began. Serbian militias took control of two-thirds of Bosnia “and launched a reign of terror against the country’s majority Muslim population.” NATO allies came to the rescue, with the U.S. playing a major role. A NATO ultimatum brought about a cease-fire in 1994.

Despite such interventions, as with the controversial U.S. aid supplied to Muslim Afghanis in their struggle against the Soviet Union during the 1980s, Muslims put this down to the enemies of Islam having their minds befuddled by Allah, since all non-Muslims are enemies of Islam. Non-Muslims who extend hospitality or generosity to Muslims are viewed as fools who are to be ruthlessly exploited. This deadly premise precludes any non-Islamic society ever having the hope of co-existence with Islam.

A few headlines from prominent online news sources, representing just one day in Islam’s latest push for global dominion…

Muslim Migrants Storm Greece/Macedonia Border
60 Minutes Crew Attacked, Beaten in Sweden by Group of African Masked Men
Danish Imam Tells Congregation to Kill Apostates and Non Muslims
After Rash of Islamist Killings, Bangladesh Considers Eliminating Islam as State Religion

Also last week in Moscow, a 39 year-old Muslim woman working as a nanny murdered her charge, a 4 year-old girl, and decapitated her. She then set the family’s apartment on fire, left with the severed head, and displayed the gruesome trophy while milling about on the street shouting Islamic phrases. After her arrest, she reportedly told a reporter that Allah had ordered her to commit the slaying.

Despite Islam’s 1400-year history of barbarism, aggression, treachery, female genital mutilation, rampant pedophilia, misogyny, and institutionalized sexual assault, this is a culture our government and the press are demanding that Westerners embrace. This is a culture that the political left argues is just as viable and civilized as our own.

What will they insist that we countenance next? Cannibalism?

Recently, Felicia Escobar, President Obama’s special assistant for immigration policy, told a National Association of Counties task force that the administration wants to bring even more displaced migrants from Syria to the U.S. despite the national security implications (by “more,” I mean more than those who have arrived since 2012 and the 10,000 which Obama summarily ordered the states to absorb during the course of this year).

The White House clearly knows they’re dangerous, but they want them to come anyway, as do European leaders, who are virtually ignoring the civil unrest and terror attacks incited by Muslims within their own borders. Across the West, political leaders are denying the existence of Islamist expansionism and suppressing any discussion thereof. Their rhetoric and policies have long since passed qualifying as imprudent or surreal; they are treasonous and insane.

It’s bad enough to have a malevolent cabal attempting to set Americans up for murder and mayhem at the hands of devils in order to advance their political objectives. The question is: Will we be stupid enough collectively to compound the situation by falling for their politically correct suicide on an installment plan?

Despite some Republicans’ distaste for the front-running GOP presidential candidate, his infusion of nationalistic fervor into the race is just what we need right now. We cannot wait until several hundred thousand Muslim migrants and their overseas oil-rich patrons establish the political foothold they’ve established in Britain and other nations across the Atlantic, or the cure will be more distasteful than most Americans will ever abide.

Because whatever the circumstances, we know that Muslims will not respond with gratitude to our hospitality. They never do.

Originally published in WorldNetDaily

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns
Why the Left Fears Me

Why the Left Fears Me

Earlier this week, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump came under intense fire over his proposal to initiate a hiatus of entries into the U.S. for Muslims, including refugees, tourists and some Muslim American citizens. His is similar to a policy employed by President Roosevelt during World War II pertaining to those of German, Italian and Japanese descent. At that time, the government had no way of knowing who among those might be Axis sympathizers or operatives.

While I am not a Trump supporter, and have numerous suspicions as to why he is in the race for the nomination at all, his rationale is quite sound and obviously has precedent.

Trump’s willingness to speak frankly on this and other key topics has resonated with many Americans who, as we already know, are far more concerned about terrorism, the economic and social impact of unfettered illegal immigration, and corruption in government than they are concerned about climate change, economic injustice and “safe spaces” for radicals, racists and deviants on college campuses.

I can always tell I’ve hit a nerve when something I’ve written causes the left-wing websites to go berserk in their efforts to ridicule me following its publication. When anyone hits a nerve, we typically see more hyperbole, mischaracterization and ridiculous extrapolations than usual from the left. By hitting a nerve, I mean articulating concepts truly threatening to the agenda of the left.

Black conservatives tend to grind on those aforementioned leftist nerves by their very existence; this is why such vigorous efforts are made by the left to marginalize them. Part of this stems from leftists’ thinly veiled racism; they resent black conservatives for not “minding their place” by rejecting liberal doctrine and liberals’ largesse.

Another factor is a fallacy or stereotype the left itself created, and which is a component of negrophilia: The notion that black Americans possess some mysterious, sage wisdom originating in their unique collective experience on this continent.

Following this line of reasoning, it’s all well and good for a right-wing nut job like me and my ilk to howl at the moon about communists and conspiracies, but it’s an entirely different proposition if people start seriously considering what we have to say.

Sadly, there are too many well-known conservatives (black, white and other) who never merit the scrutiny of the left because their analysis remains extraordinarily superficial. Although I don’t see anything particularly brave in doing it, I am not afraid to say what a preponderance of the evidence suggests. There are certain issues upon which I and a select few others expound which would be extremely damaging to the left’s agenda if people were to begin considering them to any meaningful degree.

A big problem the left has right now is that their lies have grown so big – and one of the biggest has to do with the nature of Islam.

Judging from how establishment Republicans reacted to Donald Trump’s proposal, we can also see that dhimmitude is endemic among this group. Indeed, many influential Republicans are at least as politically compromised due to their involvement with Islamist front groups as are influential Democrats.

Say – speaking strictly hypothetically, of course – I went even further than Trump and stated that “Muslims are garbage, and we don’t need them here under any circumstances.” Not only would the left have a field day, but those establishment Republicans and even some conservatives would balk. Hold on now – we can’t consign over a billion people to the status of garbage!

But why not? If I said “White supremacists are garbage,” I would be hard-pressed to find anyone to disagree with me. What is white supremacy? In short, it’s a pernicious belief system that embodies the inhumane. Many would concur that its followers are “garbage” in the colloquial sense.

What is Islam? It, too, is a belief system – one that advances xenophobia, institutional deception, murder, rape, extortion, slavery, pedophilia and a host of other grievous affronts to the human spirit – an embodiment of the inhumane.

If we’re being honest with ourselves, it doesn’t matter if five guys goose-stepping in circles in a garage down the block or a billion people worldwide subscribe to something; if it embodies the inhumane, we want no part of it. The only agencies that continue to doggedly insist that Islam is a benign religion meriting protection under the First Amendment are those in collusion with Islamists.

Why should the left have a cat if I disrespect Muslims in such an impudent manner? Who cares what one big fat narrow-minded meanie and Islamophobic bigot has to say, anyhow?

Well, imagine all of America suddenly becoming aware of what a dire threat Islam truly is. Their first question would be: Who left us so vulnerable to those of that vile creed in the first place? Then, they would start looking at the great many calamities for which America has been put at risk, and who is responsible. Ultimately, they would get to the causation of discrete hazards such as the recent rise in ethnic tensions, the advancement of sexual ambiguity, the shameless proliferation of crony capitalism, the weaponizing of government against the people, the marginalization of Christians and the insinuation of enemy operatives into sensitive security positions in our government, to name just a few.

The ensuing momentum of that mass of angry Americans on the march could entirely crush not only the radical left, but progressivism as well.

The left, the Obama administration and progressive Republicans know that a climate wherein Donald Trump is doing so well in his bid for the GOP nomination not in spite of, but because he is saying the things he is saying suggests that a few more prominent voices joining those such as mine could lead to the undoing of a hundred years of their evil work.

Originally published in WorldNetDaily

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns

Oppression of Muslims a Myth, but a Powerful and Popular One

obama_imam1According to the Shoebat Foundation website, the Obama administration has been helping Muslim fundamentalists push an agenda to force non-Muslim countries to enact laws prohibiting the criticism of Muslims and Islam. Sweden recently passed such laws, and Saudi Arabia has long been pressuring Norway to make criticism of Islam and its “prophet” illegal.

Currently, the #1 violent crime in Norway is the rape of Norwegian women by Muslim men – and they tend to prefer blondes.

Last week, a candidate in the European elections has been arrested after making a speech quoting from a book by Winston Churchill about Islam. Paul Weston, chairman of the Liberty GB party, was making the speech on the steps of Winchester Guildhall, Hampshire, on Saturday, when a member of the public complained to police and he was arrested.

Now, Many Americans are currently concerned about similar future actions in the face of legislation recently proposed by Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 “would create an updated comprehensive report examining the role of the Internet and other telecommunications in encouraging hate crimes based on gender, race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation and create recommendations to address such crimes,” carrying particular provisions for those who “insult Islam.”

While in Malaysia last week, President Obama President Obama was asked by Grand Imam Ismail Muhammad to end oppression against Muslims worldwide.

“Pray for me,” Obama is said to have replied.

Yet the casual observer is hard-pressed to find this “oppression against Muslims worldwide.” More accurately, it appears that (as Islamist supremacists have done for 1400 years) Muslims have a penchant for playing a passive-aggressive game with societies they seek to conquer, claiming oppression while concurrently conspiring to subjugate the preeminent societal paradigm – by any means necessary.

Relevant Links:

The Real Agenda behind Susan Rice being Told to Lie
Big chill: Feds want to scour Net, media for ‘hate speech’
Election candidate arrested over Churchill speech

Posted by Erik Rush in News

But Don’t Offend the Muslims…

Thank God that in this day and age of the press determining it wishes to aid in the downfall of civilized society as opposed to doing its job, whistleblowers and citizen journalists have the facility to bring news into the realm of public discussion.

rigby_murdererAs reported in Front Page Magazine in a column entitled The UK Confronts Islamism, Britain and other Western democracies are “attempting to address” the problem of Islamofascism and the attendant rape, murder, enslavement, and oppression it has brought to these nations. Unfortunately, they are attempting to do so by employing some of the same ineffectual methods we are seeing used in America – although at this point, their problem is much worse than ours.

The methods of which I speak include a basic denial of the reality of Islam and those who adhere to it to the degree that compels them to rape, murder, enslave, and oppress. These aspects are being referred to by European politicians as “extremism,” and in their approach, they seem to believe that that can separate the “extreme” actions from the perpetrators, or the perpetrators from the system (I use the term system rather than religion because Islam is a system with a religious component, much like Marxism, which simply does not codify its religious zealotry).

Part of this, I believe stems from their squishy desire to be politically correct and not offend Muslims, and the other is sheer stupidity. Obviously they do not remember their own history, wherein 1000 years ago, Islamists attempted the subjugation of Europe in precisely the same manner they are attempting now. This is even proscribed in their writings; the small religious factions that emigrate into a nation, the politicizing of that faction as it grows, then finally the militant uprisings which overthrow the establishment. This is what Westerners refer to as radicalization.

But Islam has always been radical, and save for the tiny minority of Muslims who enjoy living in Western democracies and republics (and who would be quite happy if the process never progressed), Islam remains what it always has been: Manifestly unable to coexist with any other creed, and thus wholly incompatible with Western society.

So if we wish to avoid having American women raped in accord with the rapist-mass murderer Muhammad’s directives, have our citizens beaten, robbed, and hacked to death in the streets, and ultimately to be completely subjugated by howling, bearded, dress-wearing, pedophiliac primitives, we’d better get about it now.

As far as offending Muslims goes: You know what they say about making an omelet…

Posted by Erik Rush in News