Syrian refugees

“Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Murdering Scum…”

“Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Murdering Scum…”

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…”
– From Emma Lazarus’ poem “New Colossus” (inscription on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty)

Over the last week or so, news outlets have reported on aspects of the Obama administration’s attempts to deposit as many foreign criminal and culturally bankrupt miscreants as possible within the borders of the United States. Recently, it was reported that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has withdrawn his state from participation in the U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program. As a result, administration officials are working feverishly to execute an end run around Christie’s efforts to ameliorate the effects of the program in that state. Their apparent intent is to claim the federal government has the authority to continue resettling refugees there regardless of what New Jersey has to say.

As chummy as Chris Christie has been with Barack Hussein Obama, he obviously needs to keep his job after failing to stay in the running as a GOP presidential hopeful, and Obama isn’t going to be in office forever – so far as we know. Thus, Christie is probably bowing to internal pressure with regard to this issue.

An April 29 Fox News piece reported that the Obama administration is “bowing to international pressure and pursuing under-the-radar alternatives” toward bringing in more Syrian and other refugees this year. A March 30 “high-level meeting” on Syrian refugees in Geneva, Switzerland convened by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees saw the U.N. High Commissioner calling for countries to pursue “alternative avenues” for refugees, such as student visas, work visas, and “expanded family reunification programs.”

Which means that the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees is essentially instructing national governments in how to circumvent the will of provincial, state, local governments, and their constituencies in relocating hostile, uneducated, unskilled Muslims to Western nations. Some of these transplants will almost certainly be operatives of Islamist terror organizations, as several recent Muslim refugees in Europe proved to be.

It has been documented that since the start of hostilities in Syria in the Spring of 2011, the Obama administration admitted several thousand Syrian refugees into the U.S. and resettled them in three dozen different states. There have also been unconfirmed reports of refugees from Syria being clandestinely transported to the U.S. on commercial cargo jets on numerous occasions since then, and escorted to parts unknown by Department of Homeland Security personnel, as well as the alleged corroboration of same via the testimony of commercial cargo jet pilots speaking on the condition of anonymity.

It is indisputable that the Obama White House catalyzed widespread instability in the Middle East and parts of Africa, and thus the Muslim invasion of Europe. I have written here and elsewhere on the topic of European and Western elites’ orchestration of the European refugee crisis, and their desire to expand this to America for the purpose of coalescing power, neutralizing individual liberties, and expanding the global reach of their international socialist cabal.

In light of this, suffice it to say that the Obama administration is most assuredly not bowing to international pressure with regard to admitting more Middle Eastern and African Muslim refugees; it is not likely that much arm-twisting at all would be necessary to motivate that pack of scum in the indicated direction.

Also last week, it was reported that in 2015, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) summarily freed nearly 20,000 criminal aliens who had over 64,000 convictions between them. No explanation, no justification, not even a weak pretext articulated by the Obama administration – the scurvy mob was just released onto our streets.

We know that the Obama administration orchestrated the 2014 “unaccompanied minor” tsunami by virtue of evidence that remains readily available online. Many of these disaffected waifs (who have already cost American taxpayers an average of $17,000 each) wound up being members of violent Latin American gangs; others were incubating exotic Third World diseases from which American children later suffered after said waifs were quietly relocated to communities across America.

As I have said before, the importation of toxic individuals from around the globe to Western nations is calculated to touch off sufficiently increased trends in civil unrest, domestic terrorism, and crime that governments will have to implement ever more draconian measures to simply keep the peace.

Paradoxically, crimes committed by illegal alien criminals and assorted Islamists will be ignored as causative due to political correctness. They will also go some distance toward bolstering the left’s efforts against the Second Amendment. Many of the crimes and terror attacks will be framed as having been aided by the “easy access to guns” in America. True-believing lefties and the uninformed will certainly chime in with that chorus, particularly as circumstances worsen. As in Scandinavia, Britain and other European nations, citizens will have to go up against the imported troglodytes without the benefit of superior firepower.

In the West – in America – the remainder of the international socialists’ agenda and global expansion will take place under cover of a full-blown police state.

At least, that’s the plan…

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns, 0 comments
Americans ‘the Last to Know’ of Obama Treason

Americans ‘the Last to Know’ of Obama Treason

To someone born in New York City, the place where I now live is a small college town. It’s hard to view a place where the population just breaks 150, 000 when school is in session as anything else. As the crow flies, it’s about two hours north of Colorado Springs, where 57-year-old whack job Robert Lewis Dear decided to go on a shooting spree last week.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2010, the median income for a family here was $89,332. Along with Pueblo, Colorado, ours was one of the fastest cities to “snap back,” as it were, from the 2008 economic implosion.

Yet, there are homeless people everywhere. Their visibility occurred gradually but markedly within the last year. Many are middle-age people, and many are veterans.

Over the same period, the average time for processing a new application for public assistance benefits (food stamps, Medicaid, etc.) jumped from under a week to 40 business days. They’ve also cut back access to case workers drastically, which probably stretches out the overall process even more.

The length of time it takes for Medicaid recipients to schedule an appointment with a primary care physician has increased from a day or two to several weeks. To get in to see some specialists, the wait is now one of months. This is due to the millions who got dumped into Medicaid during the course of Obamacare’s implementation.

Yet, our small college town, and another one about 40 miles east of here, are slated to receive an undisclosed number of Syrian refugees – and according to Barack Hussein Obama, the counties concerned damn well better not balk at putting them on the food stamp rolls. The refugees are part of Obama’s nationwide Syrian refugee drop, which is now being hotly debated.

This week, our treasonous war-criminal president flitted off to France to discuss climate change – an issue that homeless, jobless and dispossessed Americans care so much about – with a bunch of other world leaders. As if it weren’t bad enough that climate change is a counterfeit issue that exists only so Western governments might more effectively enslave taxpayers and business economically.

Perhaps to defray any discussion of his failure to dispatch ISIS (which of course he has no intention of doing), Obama said that the meeting in Paris to discuss climate change was some sort of brave and audacious “act of defiance” in the face of ISIS, given its recent attack on that city.

It isn’t the first time the administration has proffered the notion that there’s some mysterious interplay between terrorism and completely unrelated factors. One may recall the inane blatherings of State Department spokesidiots Jen Psaki and Marie Harf, who have floated ideas such as poverty causing terrorism, and that if the climate wasn’t so screwy, the world’s Muslims might not go feral en masse and kill people.

All this is leaving aside the fact that the treasonous war-criminal president in question created, armed, trained and funded ISIS – or ISIL, Islamic State, Daesh, the Keystone Kamels, or whatever appellation they’re using this month to reference the barbarians. Now, strategically displaced Muslims and strategically placed terrorists are forming a chaotic, angry wave from east to west – a wave that is cresting in Europe and, if Obama gets his way, will break upon America.

The world knows all of this, by the way; here, I am referencing the incontrovertible body of evidence that Barack Obama is effectively the commander in chief of ISIS, and arguably a better one than he is of the U.S. Armed Forces.

At this point, it is only in the West that this is not widely understood.

So, given Obama’s designs and the world’s knowledge of them, all of the public debate over the White House’s anti-terrorism policies is nothing but theater. It’s for us. The boobs. The great unwashed, moronic masses.

We are the proverbial “last to know.”

Our treasonous war-criminal president’s policies have set America up quite nicely for a major terrorist attack, perhaps of a much wider scope than the recent attacks in Paris. These include everything from a refusal to even rhetorically associate Islamic terrorism with Muslims, to the nationwide Syrian refugee drop, to the clandestine importation of Muslims from destabilized nations in the Middle East and Africa, to an absolute refusal to effectively monitor who comes and goes in this country.

Americans will die, and despite his feigned outrage after the fact, it will have been due to the deliberate intention of Barack Hussein Obama.

In October of 2013, the White House took down its online visitor logs, blaming a partial government shutdown that had temporarily idled 17 percent of the federal workforce. The fact is that astute individuals in the alternative press and other patriotic Americans had begun widely discussing the Rogue’s Gallery of America-hating scum that paid visits to the White House on a regular basis, some with dizzying frequency.

Obama simply wanted to stop that flow of information.

A nation like ours does not go from respecting personal liberties and the rule of law to “I’ve got a pen, and I’ve got a phone” overnight. Are there really so many ethically compromised individuals in our government that there is no hope for any among them finally deciding to exercise the rule of law and remove this tyrant? Are they just cowards, willing to let Obama touch off World War III rather than risk the Black Lives Matter crowd setting America ablaze for “taking down” our precious first black president on account of his proclivity for treason and crimes against humanity?

Or are they, as some suspect, party to a much broader agenda, perhaps one rooted in the belief that our planet’s human population cut by three-fourths – even overnight – would be much better for everyone going forward?

Originally published in WorldNetDaily

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns, 0 comments
The Left’s Motive for Importing Terrorists

The Left’s Motive for Importing Terrorists

Since the Nov. 13 terror attacks in Paris, we have seen a distinct spike in the vociferous defense of Islam on the part of the left. Along with patent denials that Islam and Muslims have anything to do with terrorism, those on the left have been shilling for the Obama administration’s desire to admit thousands of potential jihadis from war-torn areas of the Middle East into the United States.

Despite the reticence of the American press to report on the chaos being wrought by Muslim refugees entering Europe, world press reports are replete with the evidence of same. Additionally, such trifles as the recent Paris terror attacks and the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing having been executed by Muslim “refugees” give clear indication that it is impossible to discern whom among any population of Muslim refugees to America will become chain store franchisees versus becoming terrorists.

Barack Hussein Obama and his co-conspirators continue to advance the narrative of benign Muslim refugees and the existence of sound vetting processes for their admission. Obama ridicules those in America who urge caution, labeling them as ninnies who are afraid of “widows and orphans” despite women and children being a clear minority among the European refugees.

Through all of this, the leftist press and politicos alike parrot Obama’s talking points verbatim.

On an average day, leftist media operative and activist Sally Kohn (against whom I’ve faced off publicly once or twice) engages in some of the most odious subversive activity against the American people, the rule of law, and Liberty itself. Recently, her social media has exhibited an incomprehensibly craven defense of Islam and its adherents.

Here, Kohn employs the most decrepit illogic imaginable in opposing American prudence in considering Muslim refugees for admission into the United States.

This feeble emotional blackmail extrapolates Americans’ characteristic generosity to suicidal proportions, and is the same raison d’être liberals have used to keep us awash in illegal aliens from Latin America. That aside, the premeditation of people who slithered into Europe expressly to abuse Europeans’ generosity (not to mention maiming and killing them) apparently doesn’t raise a red flag for Kohn. Nor apparently does she take into account the 1400-year history of Muslims celebrating their patron demon Allah having “clouded the minds” of enemies who showed compassion toward Muslim populations, only to be cruelly subjugated by the same Muslim populations later on.

CNN’s Elise Labott was recently suspended for two weeks by her network after tweeting her low opinion of the House of Representatives’ vote to tighten the screening process for Syrian refugees. The measure’s intent was not to refuse admission to any, nor to admit only ten per year – it was simply to reinforce the vetting process, which Obama’s own FBI director says is a futile pursuit anyway.


Again, we have someone who apparently advocates pretty much nothing in the way of requirements for admitting these refugees.

The correlation between the rise in Muslim violence and liberals rushing to their defense is undeniable: The more that Muslims themselves affirm our need for vigilance against Islam, the more their advocates on the left engage in damage control through disinformation calculated to placate native populations whilst Islamists advance their agenda.

The liberal narrative concerning these refugees has been beyond Orwellian, and to the rational mind, it all appears quite surreal. This widespread, toadying defense of Muslim brutality by liberals is an exquisite example of mind control via all of the methods of propaganda brought to bear against a population.

Take Hillary Clinton’s Nov. 19 tweet, for example…

To give an idea of how deeply narcissistic leftists are, consider this: The Clinton campaign was so proud of Hillary’s remark that they concocted a hard-hitting graphic for their social media which actually showcased the treasonous tweet.


It is widely known among those who do not get their news from the alphabet TV networks that Obama has been clandestinely importing Muslims from Syria, Iraq, Somalia, and other destabilized Muslim nations for several years. Now, on the pretext of humanitarianism, he intends to prey upon Americans’ sympathy in order to import tens of thousands more.

Why do leftists advocate for a policy that will domestically destabilize America? As with so many harmful policies they’ve supported, they do so that they may later offer a statist, liberty-killing remedy. In this case, the cure will be a more well-developed surveillance and police state, which they surmise Americans will welcome when we’re being hacked to death on our streets by Muslims.

The bipartisan legislation upon which the House voted last week to augment screening procedures for Syrian refugees passed 289-137. Although Obama said he would veto this measure if it got to his desk, the upside is that we now have a list of 137 members of Congress who should be stripped of their citizenship and exiled to Syria.

Originally published in WorldNetDaily

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns, 4 comments
Subtle Convergence of Obama-Engineered Crises

Subtle Convergence of Obama-Engineered Crises

Millions of individuals fleeing Syria and other Arab Muslim nations that were systematically destabilized over the last several years by the regime of Barack Hussein Obama are attempting to enter Europe. This in turn has resulted in political pressure being put on the White House to allow an undisclosed number of these persons – who are being referred to as “refugees” by the international community and the press – into the United States.

Some Washington lawmakers have expressed concern that relaxing our immigration regulations yet further to accommodate these displaced persons would pose a grave security risk to the United States (as though the Obama administration is concerned with such trifles), and that anyone being considered for admittance must be properly vetted for potential ties to terrorist groups.

Though it is doubtful, one hopes that they would be more thoroughly scrutinized than the tens of thousands of Syrian and Somali “refugees” that Obama has furtively spirited into the U.S. over the last few years.

While the obsequious Western press showcases drowned children washing up on Turkish beaches and rioting over train passage into Europe, there’s little doubt that Barack Hussein is eagerly rubbing his palms together in anticipation of allowing untold numbers of malefactors into the country now that the approval of the international community and gullible Americans is at hand.

Let’s keep it simple and leave aside the folly and peril of America attempting to repeat Europe’s multicultural experiment after witnessing how this has destroyed Europe. Nor must we belabor the point that there is no assimilating a minority group that has no desire to be assimilated, thus any proposed increase in allowances for such émigrés is obviously contraindicated. Finally, our nation being too economically strapped these days for such a display of largesse is so agonizingly clear that it doesn’t even merit discussion.

“Not only are Syrians resorting to desperate measures to seek a better life for themselves and their families in Europe, but they are dying in the process …” – David Miliband, president, International Rescue Committee

Gotta love that “seeking a better life” bilge to rationalize America expediting her Obama-assisted suicide – which Miliband did on the same day when he chimed in with others’ calls for America to throw open its borders to the displaced Arab Muslims.

Of course, we’ve been hearing that propaganda for decades referencing illegal immigrants from Mexico, haven’t we? “Seeking a better life for themselves north of the border.” No doubt that phraseology was calculated to engender our sympathy, as though the entirely understandable motivations projected onto poor little oppressed Pablo by liberals accorded him the right to partake in that which he had no role in establishing (and to which he has since demonstrated he has no intention of contributing).

Well, we accommodated poor little oppressed Pablo in his quest to escape the grinding poverty of his south-of-the-border septic tank to the tune of tens of millions just like him, and were deceived into overlooking the abject insanity of doing so from cultural, economic and national security perspectives.

Now we have MS-13 gang members, Zetas, drug-cartel soldiers, assorted Africans, Arabs, Asians and who-knows-who “seeking a better life for themselves” as they stream unmolested across our border with the easy grace of cockroaches on a dimly lit tenement floor.

That being the case, in considering how to put up these alleged refugees, we might as well throw critical thinking and caution entirely to the wind, right?

For example, we certainly wouldn’t want to ask why some of the oil-rich Arab Muslim countries aren’t providing asylum for these refugees, because we would discover that they don’t want to risk being deluged by jihadis. We might learn that jihad is prioritized above humanitarianism in Arab Muslim culture, and that wealthy Muslim nations will pour billions into Islamist expansionism (mosques, madrassas, weapons), but they won’t prepare for the inevitable humanitarian crisis that lurks around the corner for every nation, even when they know it will threaten fellow Muslims.

And why would we remind ourselves of how for months, we have been railing against the Obama administration’s cruel summary dismissal of thousands of asylum-seeking Christians and other religious minorities who are being enslaved and murdered by al-Qaida and the ISIS terror group in the very same Arab Muslim nations from which the refugees in Europe hail? If we considered that bit of business, we might demand that our government categorically deny admittance to so much as one of these people.

It is also definitely worth a look at the similarities between this European refugee crisis and the “undocumented minor” onslaught that took place on our border with Mexico in 2014. One major resemblance would be the contrived flavor of the stories the European refugees related to the press and aid workers. These were very reminiscent of the scripted tall tales we heard in the background stories of “refugees” in the 2014 crisis.

I find it very curious indeed that nearly identical methods and circumstances are tending to materialize in high-profile crises around the world, wherein the uncanny character of a given calamity winds up revealing the Obama administration’s treacherous, greasy fingerprints.

So is this Arab Muslim invasion of Europe an unfortunate happenstance, or is it another crisis in the school of the Cloward and Piven strategy of orchestrated crisis (through which political change is forced via the deliberate engineering of widespread instability in social, economic or political realms)? The Marxist-derived treason of Cloward-Piven has indeed been deployed by this administration previously – in precipitating the 2014 border crisis, in what the Justice Department attempted to bring about through “Operation Fast and Furious,” and in the current state of escalating tensions between inner-city blacks and police.

These are, or were, entirely contrived by the White House and entirely calculated to bring about desired (though illicit and profoundly injurious) objectives. Any who would challenge this contention are either denying, or they’re lying.

Posted by Erik Rush in Columns, 0 comments